Lost bookings
At $275 per night, one lost three-night stay is $825 before fees, cleaning margin, and repeat-guest value.
Loading your case workspace...
Use major booking platforms' official review policies to your advantage. Build a clear, evidence-backed removal request that helps protect your income and reputation.
The strongest facts, the matching policy category, and only the records needed to prove the connection.
It does not have to destroy a listing to hurt. A little doubt can lower conversion, pressure the nightly rate, and send the next booking to cleaner social proof.
At $275 per night, one lost three-night stay is $825 before fees, cleaning margin, and repeat-guest value.
Even when occupancy holds, doubt can force lower pricing, extra concessions, or more time spent reassuring guests.
Reviews shape booking decisions. A policy-violating review is a revenue problem, not simply an ego bruise.
Airbnb currently limits the same received review to two removal requests. That means the first request needs to be a strategic filing, not a rough draft.
If request one is denied, the case needs more than a rewrite. The decision becomes new evidence, and the next request needs a sharper path.
Reviewer's Desk is designed for that moment. A denial will unlock a second-pass simulation that tests how a reviewer may read the first decision. It remains feature-flagged while we finish its evaluation set.
Every stage preserves what was known, which evidence was used, and what changed. That is what lets the product improve a case without rewriting history.
Airbnb and Vrbo run through separate policy packs, evidence expectations, and output checks.
Live Wave 1Add, annotate, replace, remove, restore, and reorder records before confirming the filing set.
Versioned Nothing overwrittenEditable filing language, validation notes, a source checklist, and a polished PDF remain tied to one revision.
Included One rebuildSecond-round review simulation is behind a feature flag until its evaluations meet the release threshold.
Later Not sold yetGet an instant, candid first read before spending money on a filing. Weak cases are told no. Ambiguous cases get a clear list of what would make them stronger.
Appeal products stay locked until the free score finds a credible basis for removal. If the paid engine cannot produce a supportable filing, the purchase is refunded.
Structure and source material for a host writing the final request.
A finished, validated request built from your confirmed evidence.
Deeper support for a listing with multiple active review problems.
STR Appeal organizes a host's own facts and explicitly evaluates them against the platform's published review guidance. It does not access your platform account, impersonate you, fabricate evidence, or submit without you. You remain responsible for factual accuracy and the final filing.
No. Only the platform makes that decision. We promise a candid eligibility screen and the strongest supportable presentation of the facts, not an outcome.
You can replace, remove, restore, annotate, and reorder evidence before generation. Replaced files remain in the audit history but are excluded from future analysis. New evidence after generation creates a new revision rather than overwriting the first.
The original filing stays preserved. You can add the decision, update the evidence, and use the included rebuild to create a distinct second-round revision. Reviewer's Desk will be added after its evaluation phase.
Production evidence is designed for private storage with strict account-level access. Review text, evidence contents, names, and email addresses are excluded from product analytics. Export and deletion controls are part of the account area.
Start free. We will tell you when the facts do not justify buying anything.
Get my case score